We cannot allow intolerance of religious morals

Do unto others

by Bill Scholl

“We’ll remember in November,” is a powerful chorus in American democracy when the people remind their elected representatives that they are accountable.

In Kansas, when so many seats are safe for the prevailing political party, it is very important that we also remember in August.

August 7 will be the primaries when many senators/representatives will be chosen. Recent statements and votes by our elected officials should give all people of faith pause.

Some politicians in Kansas have attacked Catholics, labeling them bigots for upholding the religious belief that children have the right to both a mother and a father. Catholics and people of faith also have the right of conscience to refuse participation in arrangements that violate their Christian morals.

Thanks to the advocacy of many who responded to our Kansas bishops’ call to protect adoption choice, the bill of the same name passed the Senate and the House and went to Gov. Jeff Coyler’s desk for his signature.

It was a live-and-let-live approach that never sought to stop same-sex couples from adoption, but rather to protect the status quo that allows faith-based groups to not participate in such arrangements.

What should have been a common-sense protection of religious freedom to ensure that we have as many diverse groups as possible helping Kansas kids find forever homes was turned into a referendum on the LGBTQ agenda to marginalize and destroy any group who dissents or does not wish to enable their version of family.

Even Justice Anthony Kennedy who wrote the majority opinion for Obergefell v. Hodges, which made same-sex marriage the law across the U.S., declared in that statement: “It must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere to religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be condoned. The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the principles that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they have long revered.”

As Catholics, we should be aware that our practice of faith in the public square is being attacked as bigotry. We need leaders who can safeguard true diversity and not force Christians into the closet just as others are getting out.

We need to elect officials who will not, in the name of tolerance, allow Kansas to become intolerant of religious morals.

Mark your calendars for Aug. 7 and make sure you’re registered to vote in the primaries and find out how your senator and representatives voted on this law by going online to: www.archkck.org/socialjustice.

Decide for yourself, and vote.

2 Responses

  1. Amy Schmidt at |

    I love this article! I took a stand and wrote to our House of Representatives regarding my disappointment that the House voted against the motion to concur with HB 2481, which contains the Adoption Protection Act. We should protect faith-based adoption providers so that they are free to continue serving some of the most vulnerable Kansans: children in need of a loving home. I am shocked that in Kansas our elected officials would refuse to protect groups like Catholic Charities from political activists who would shut them down for ideological reasons.

    Thank you for your honest article on this matter. It was spot on. With primaries around the corner, it is important for voters to be educated and not led by their emotions when making important decisions about our leaders.

    Reply
  2. Mary Patterson at |

    Agreed. Because it is immoral to refuse immigrants, cut funding to schools, decrease Medicaid for children, allow guns on college campuses and plunge our state into debt. Thank you for making it clear who we should vote for come November.

    Reply

Leave a Reply