by Edgardo Ayala
SAN SALVADOR, El Salvador (CNS) — Although the Supreme Court struck down the country’s amnesty law, it does not mean that chaos will arise if lawsuits are filed against government leaders who played a leading role in the country’s long civil war, said human rights defenders.
Adopted in 1993 after the 12-year conflict ended, the law protected the military, paramilitary groups and guerrilla fighters involved in hostilities.
The court’s decision July 13 opens the door to lawsuits from victims of abuses during the war to seek compensation. It shocked both liberals and conservatives, as members of both sides argued that repealing the law would result in thousands of lawsuits that would destabilize the country.
However, the brother of one of four U.S. missionaries killed early in the war said he was not interested in pursuing legal action against anyone connected with the deaths in December 1980.
James Kazel, brother of Ursuline Sister Dorothy Kazel of Cleveland, said July 15 that there is no need to pursue legal action more than 35 years after his sister’s murder.
“Way back, four or five years after the murder, my brother-in-law Bob, a lawyer, tried to persuade my dad to pursue a lawsuit, and my father never wanted to push for it,” Kazel told Catholic News Service. “My dad wanted no part of it. He said ‘It’s over with. She’s gone.’ And he went on with his life.”
Sister Susan Durkin, president of the Ursuline Sisters of Cleveland, said the order was not interested in filing suit against any Salvadoran officials responsible for the death of one of their members.
“We’ve never sought any sort of financial remuneration,” Sister Susan told CNS July 15. A lawsuit would not “replace the lives that have been lost. We just continue to seek peace and justice for the country of El Salvador, especially peace.”
After the decision, rights defenders argued that Salvadoran officials should not seek to jail hundreds of “war criminals,” explaining instead that restorative justice efforts would better bring truth and relief to victims of the violence.
“We want the perpetrators to apologize, and the country must seek appropriate mechanisms to forgive and repair, so that that does not happen again,” Miguel Montenegro, director of the nongovernmental Human Rights Commission, told CNS.
David Morales, human rights ombudsman of El Salvador, told reporters that “politicians are sending messages of fear, but at this stage of our democracy, those speeches are nonsense.”
“There will be no chaos nor witch hunt, but some justice to victims,” he told reporters.
In its ruling, the court declared as unconstitutional portions of the amnesty law because they violated war crime victims’ right to access justice and reparation. The judges also said that war crimes do not expire and can be prosecuted regardless of when they were committed.
The law was passed after the U.N. Truth Commission investigated 30 cases of war crimes, 20 of which were committed by the army, and 12 by guerrillas.
The killing of San Salvador Archbishop Oscar A. Romero in 1980 and six Jesuit priests and two women in 1989 are believe to be among the cases considered by the commission.
With the law set aside, even Salvadoran President Salvador Sanchez Ceren, a former guerrilla commander, could be prosecuted. So could former president Alfredo Cristiani, who was army commander in chief in 1989 when the Jesuits were murdered.
Montenegro said that before forgiveness can be given, the truth surrounding atrocities must come to light. The war left about 70,000 people dead and more than 8,000 missing.
“Those opposed to justice have always invoked the amnesty law, but they can’t hide behind it anymore,” Montenegro said.