Church and state

Column: Catholics need to help shape new political reality

Church and State

Michael Schuttloffel is the executive director of the Kansas Catholic Conference.

by Michael Schuttloffel

Very little about what is to come between now and Election Day is clear, except this: When the dust settles, at least one of America’s great political parties will never be the same.

The 162-year old Republican Party seems on the verge of coming apart at the seams. The country is watching it careen toward Cleveland in much the same way onlookers might observe a car without a driver barrel through an intersection: with a mix of fascination and horror.

And whatever the short-term electoral fallout, the GOP’s implosion could have very unpredictable consequences for the world’s oldest political party, the Democratic Party, which already has serious stresses of its own.

There is ample reason for concern about the direction our politics are taking; however, this also has the potential to be a moment of creative destruction. And if there is to be a new political alignment, Catholics have the opportunity to help shape it.

The Catholic moral tradition can play a vital role in helping to steer our politics away from interest group tribalism. Concepts like “human flourishing” and “the dignity of the person” need to be reintroduced into our political discourse. Catholic moral thinking can help turn the conversation toward what is good for society, instead of what is good for me, myself and I.

The Catholic bishops have for years been encouraging the faithful to put principle before party. Parties are, after all, a means of organizing politically, nothing more. The widespread dissatisfaction with party “establishments” should make this an opportune time to warn against uncritical devotion to political brand names.

Yet a decrease in attachment to party does not automatically translate into an increase in sober-minded citizenship based on moral principle. Witness the trend in recent presidential elections toward cult-of-personality politics. It is not exactly progress if blind loyalty to a political brand name is replaced with blind loyalty to a messiah in a suit and tie.

It is said on an almost daily basis now that the voters are angry. This is not in and of itself a bad thing. Even the Lord grew angry at the moneychangers who had turned his Father’s house into a “marketplace” and a “den of thieves.” One can only imagine what he would have thought of Washington.

Righteous anger is not the same thing as rage, however. If these immense levels of voter frustration are not joined to a genuine concern for the common good, the temple may be torn down rather than cleansed.

About the author

Michael Schuttloffel

Leave a Comment